"ON BEING SANE IN INSANE PLACES"
The most famous experiment against psychiatric diagnosis
David Rosenhan's 1973 paper in Science is the most-cited evidence against psychiatric diagnosis. It cannot be relied on as evidence — though it has never been retracted.
Documents located in Rosenhan's private papers by the journalist Susannah Cahalan, and reported in the peer-reviewed literature by the sociologist Andrew Scull, establish that: Rosenhan's own admission record at Haverford State Hospital in February 1969 contains far more symptom reporting than the three words he published — hallucinations lasting months, thought insertion and suicidal thoughts; and that a ninth participant, Harry Lando, whose experience contradicted the published findings, was excluded.
And the precision we owe: "documented serious doubts" is not the same as "proven fraudulent". Cahalan's book (2019) is a secondary source, a trade non-fiction work. Robert Spitzer had already made a methodological critique in 1975.
Why it is here and not in the main narrative: because the same chain of evidence — journalistic research in private papers — is rejected elsewhere on this page. A standard that changes with the conclusion is not a standard.
[54] Rosenhan DL, Science 1973;179(4070):250-258 · [55] Cahalan S, The Great Pretender, 2019 — secondary · [56] Scull A, History of Psychiatry · [57] Spitzer RL, 1975